Measuring cloud performance just got easier and better

In February 2015, Google Cloud Platform and 30+ industry leaders and researchers launched PerfKit Benchmarker (PKB). PKB is an open source cloud benchmarking tool with more than 500 contributors from across the industry, including major cloud providers, hardware vendors and academia.

Today we're proud to announce our version 1.0 release. PKB supports 9 cloud providers, including AliCloud, Amazon Web Services, CloudStack, DigitalOcean, Google Cloud Platform, Kubernetes, Microsoft Azure, OpenStack, Rackspace, as well as the machine under your desk or in your datacenter. It fully automates 26 benchmarks covering compute, network and storage primitives, common applications like Tomcat and Cassandra, as well as cloud-specific services like object storage and managed MySQL. It also offers popular benchmarks such as EPFL EcoCloud Web Search, and EPFL EcoCloud Web Serving.

Since we first released PKB, we've seen strong engagement from researchers, industry partners and universities, making it a real community effort. PKB is being used today to measure performance across public clouds, bare-metal hardware and hardware simulations.
Fig. 1 PerfKit Benchmarker architecture



We're now declaring PerfKit Benchmarker V1 because the community believes we have the right set of benchmarks to cover the most common usage scenarios, the framework provides the right abstractions making it easy to extend and maintain and we've achieved the right balance between variance and runtime. PKB will continue to evolve and improve, covering new workloads and scenarios to keep pace with the ever changing cloud development design patterns.

Javier Picorel, a researcher from EPFL EcoCloud explained here why CloudSuite chose to integrate with PKB:
Cloud computing has become the dominant computing platform for delivering scalable online services to a global user base all over the world. The constant emergence of new services, growing user bases and data deluge result in ever-increasing computational requirements for the service providers. Popular online services, such as web search, social networks and video streaming, are hosted by private or public cloud providers in large cloud-server systems, which comprise thousands of servers. Since its inception, CloudSuite has emerged as a popular suite of benchmarks, both in industry and among academics, to benchmark the performance of cloud servers. CloudSuite facilitates research in the field of servers specialized for cloud workloads (e.g., Scale-out Processors) and the development of real products in the server industry (e.g., Cavium Thunderx Processor). 
We believe that PerfKit Benchmarker (PKB) is a step towards the standardization of cloud benchmarking. In essence, we envision PKB as the “SPEC for cloud-server systems.” Naturally, our goals match with PKB's and the strong consortium put together by Google convinced us to team up. On the technical side, we are excited about the standard APIs that PKB provides, enabling the automated deployment of our benchmarks into the most well-known cloud-server providers. We believe that PKB has all the potential to be established as the de-facto standard for cloud benchmarking. Therefore, we expect it to grab the attention of cloud providers, academics and industry, while integrating more and the most recent online services.”

Carlos Torres is a Performance Engineer at Rackspace. At Rackspace, Carlos and his team help other developers performance test their products. They identify critical performance scenarios, develop benchmarks and tools to facilitate the execution and analysis of those scenarios, and provide guidance to other teams to develop their performance tests. Here's what he said:
There are two main cases where I use PKB. One is to provide data for comparative analysis of hardware/software configurations to understand their performance characteristics, and the other is for measuring and tracking performance across software releases. PKB has brought me multiple benefits, but if I had to choose three, I'd say, speed, reproducibility and flexibility.
Speed: Before PKB, configuring and executing a complex benchmark that made use of a multi-node distributed system, such as a 9-node Hadoop cluster with HDFS, took hours of tedious setup, scripting and validation. Maintenance of those scripts, and knowing the current best practices for deploying such systems was a nightmare. Once you executed a benchmark, gathering the data from the tests usually involved manually executing scripts to scrape, parse and copy the data from multiple machines. Now, with PKB, it is very easy to execute, not one, but even multiple of these benchmarks, against every major cloud, usually with just one command. I can rely on the community's expertise, and for the most part, trust the configurations provided with each of the benchmarks. Finally, PKB makes is really easy to consume the data gathered from the tests, since it produces JSON output of the results. 
Reproducibility: Just like in science, reproducibility is a very important aspect of performance engineering. To confirm that either a bottleneck exists, or that it has been fixed, it is necessary to reliably reproduce a workload. Previous to PKB, it was tedious to keep track of all the software versions and configuration settings needed to replicate a benchmark, which sometimes were not documented and hence forgotten. This made reproducibility hard, and error prone. By using the same PKB version, with a single command, I can easily recreate complex benchmarks, and know that I'm executing the same set of software since PKB explicitly tracks versions of the applications, benchmarks and tools used. Also by just sharing the command I used for a test, other users can recreate the same test in no time. 
Flexibility: One of the best features of PKB is the ability execute the same benchmarks across different cloud providers, machine types and compatible operating systems images. While PKB ships with great defaults for most benchmarks, it makes it very easy to execute the benchmarks using custom settings, using commands switches or configuration files that a benchmark might optionally accept. PKB doesn't just make executing benchmarks easy, but contributing new benchmarks is simple as well. It provides a set of libraries that benchmark writers can use to write, for the most part, OS-agnostic benchmark installations.“

Marcin Karkocha and Mateusz Blaszkowski from Intel are working in the software-defined infrastructure (SDI) business to make reference implementations of private clouds.
“We try to determine how specific cloud configuration options impact on workloads running inside the instances. Based on this, we want to create reference architectures for different clouds. We also run Perfkit benchmarks in order to compare and calculate capabilities of reference architectures from different providers. In our case, PKB is used in private cloud  because of that we have slightly different requirements and problems to solve. We do not focus on comparing public cloud offerings. Instead we try to find out what is the most efficient HW/SW configuration for a specific cloud.
PKB as a framework gives us a possibility to create new plugins for providers and benchmarks. Thanks to this, we are able to easily build a custom benchmarking solution which meets most of our requirements.”

Daniel Sanchez and Assistant Professor at MIT EECS told us:
“We are using PKB to investigate new multicore systems. In particular, we are designing new hardware and software techniques that allow servers to provide low, predictable response latencies efficiently. 
PerfKit has made it much easier for us to simulate new hardware techniques on a broad array of cloud computing benchmarks. This is crucial for our work, because traditional benchmark suites are more focused on batch applications, which have quite different needs from cloud computing workloads.

Our goal has always been to help customers make sense of the various cloud products and providers in a simple, transparent way. We want to be innovative, accountable and inclusive in our approach. We're happy to see this effort being welcomed by the industry and academia, and we welcome new partners and feedback.

We invite you to try PerfKit Benchmarker V1 to measure the cloud, and to join the Open Source Benchmarking effort on GitHub.

Thank you for reaching out to us. We are happy to receive your opinion and request. If you need advert or sponsored post, We’re excited you’re considering advertising or sponsoring a post on our blog. Your support is what keeps us going. With the current trend, it’s very obvious content marketing is the way to go. Banner advertising and trying to get customers through Google Adwords may get you customers but it has been proven beyond doubt that Content Marketing has more lasting benefits.
We offer majorly two types of advertising:
1. Sponsored Posts: If you are really interested in publishing a sponsored post or a press release, video content, advertorial or any other kind of sponsored post, then you are at the right place.
WHAT KIND OF SPONSORED POSTS DO WE ACCEPT?
Generally, a sponsored post can be any of the following:
Press release
Advertorial
Video content
Article
Interview
This kind of post is usually written to promote you or your business. However, we do prefer posts that naturally flow with the site’s general content. This means we can also promote artists, songs, cosmetic products and things that you love of all products or services.
DURATION & BONUSES
Every sponsored article will remain live on the site as long as this website exists. The duration is indefinite! Again, we will share your post on our social media channels and our email subscribers too will get to read your article. You’re exposing your article to our: Twitter followers, Facebook fans and other social networks.

We will also try as much as possible to optimize your post for search engines as well.

Submission of Materials : Sponsored post should be well written in English language and all materials must be delivered via electronic medium. All sponsored posts must be delivered via electronic version, either on disk or e-mail on Microsoft Word unless otherwise noted.
PRICING
The price largely depends on if you’re writing the content or we’re to do that. But if your are writing the content, it is $60 per article.

2. Banner Advertising: We also offer banner advertising in various sizes and of course, our prices are flexible. you may choose to for the weekly rate or simply buy your desired number of impressions.

Technical Details And Pricing
Banner Size 300 X 250 pixels : Appears on the home page and below all pages on the site.
Banner Size 728 X 90 pixels: Appears on the top right Corner of the homepage and all pages on the site.
Large rectangle Banner Size (336x280) : Appears on the home page and below all pages on the site.
Small square (200x200) : Appears on the right side of the home page and all pages on the site.
Half page (300x600) : Appears on the right side of the home page and all pages on the site.
Portrait (300x1050) : Appears on the right side of the home page and all pages on the site.
Billboard (970x250) : Appears on the home page.

Submission of Materials : Banner ads can be in jpeg, jpg and gif format. All materials must be deliverd via electronic medium. All ads must be delivered via electronic version, either on disk or e-mail in the ordered pixel dimensions unless otherwise noted.
For advertising offers, send an email with your name,company, website, country and advert or sponsored post you want to appear on our website to omodjk(at)gmail(dot)com

Normally, we should respond within 48 hours.

Previous Post Next Post

Ad — After Posts / Before Footer

                     Copyright Notice

All rights reserved. This material, and other digital contents on this website, may not be reproduced, published, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from Alexa News Network Limited (Alexa.ng). 

نموذج الاتصال